Joseph v. Conway
| Joseph Roy |
| James Conway |
| 1:2007cv05223 |
| December 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| John Gleeson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM DECISION, Joseph has failed to show a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Accordingly, his habeas petition is denied. Additionally, I decline to issue a certificate of appealability because Joseph has not made a substantial showi ng of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), I certify that any appeal taken from this decision and order would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. So Ordered by Circuit Judge VJ-Denny Chin on 4/26/2023. (TLH)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: On December 11, 2007, Petitioner Roy Joseph filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus seeking relief from a January 8, 2002 conviction in the Supreme Court of New York State, Kings County. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order, the Court finds that Petitioner's petition is eligible for statutory tolling. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 8/4/2021. (Williams, Erica)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR HABEAS RELIEF: For the reasons set forth herein, petitioner Roy Joseph has failed to establish his entitlement to either statutory or equitable tolling of the one-year statute of limitations set for in 28 U. S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED as time-barred. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis is denied for the purpose of any appeal.The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 2/20/2013. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joseph v. Conway | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Roy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Conway | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
