Matthews v. Powlen et al
| Sonji Matthews |
| ACS N. Powlen, ACS-DLS Laleta Cartwright, L. Potterkahn, Anne Belox, Sandra Schpoon, Jane Doe, Rebecca Shinner, Mr. Elkins and Mr. Segal |
| 1:2008cv00698 |
| January 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Raymond J. Dearie |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendant's 39 motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. C/M. Forwarded for judgment. Ordered by Chief Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 10/30/2009. (Chee, Alvin)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: On May 4, 2009, this Court granted plaintiff 20 additional days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Bloom on April 1, 2009, (Doc. No. 23 ). No objections were filed. The Court now adopts the Report a nd Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiffs' claims against defendants Schpoon, Belox, and Cartwright are accordingly dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Ordered by Chief Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 6/2/2009. C/M. (Fwd'd for judgment) (Brucella, Michelle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
