Freund v. Weinstein et al
Plaintiff: Maurice Freund
Defendant: Eli Weinstein, Michael Gindi, Benjamin Hager, Bushwick Enterprise Group, LLC, Siforov, Inc. and Quick 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary LLC
Case Number: 1:2008cv01469
Filed: April 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 253 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The attached order addresses the claims remaining in this action. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Siforov, Quick LLC, Shain, and Gindi, and all cross-claims asserted by Defe ndants Eli Weinstein and Pine Projects, are dismissed. Moreover, if Defendants Shain and Gindi do not indicate whether they intend to pursue their cross-claims by July 29, 2016 and file proposed joint pretrial order submissions by August 5, 2016, their cross-claims will also be dismissed. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/19/2016. (Chan, Grace)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 206 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go: Motion Hearing held on 4/18/2013. Appearances by S. Rubin for plaintiff; P. Carlebach for Weinstein defendants; C. Yannucci for Hager; J. Golenbock for Shain. Rulings made on the record and in separate order on various motions to compel. As to plaintiff's motion to compel 193 , Hager must produce by 4/23/2013 specified documents for in camera inspection and supplement his opposition by 5/3/2013 with r espect to the documents on his supplemental privilege log. Plaintiff's response is due by 5/10/2013. As to Hager's motion to compel 198 , plaintiff should supplement his claim of privilege by 4/30/2013 and any response is due 5/3/2013. Plaintiff's deposition must be held by the week of 6/9/2013. Plaintiff's motions to compel 200 , 202 the Weinstein defendants are granted. Counsel for Weinstein must confirm by 4/25/2013 a date for Weinstein's deposition, which m ust take place no later than 5/24/2013. Plaintiff's motion to compel 203 production of documents pertaining to the disciplinary action against Hager is granted, but the order stayed until 5/2/2013 to permit Hager to seek a ruling from the First Department regarding confidentiality of the documents. Discovery is extended to 6/17/2013. Settlement will be discussed at the conference scheduled for 5/14/2013 at 2:00 p.m. FTR: 4:16 - 5:24. (Albertsen, Joanne)
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 143 Motion to Compel; and granting in part, denying in part and taking under advisement in part 149 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 8/31/2010. (Go, Marilyn)
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER denying 102 Motion for Contempt. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 11/23/2009. (Proujansky, Josh)
July 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 77 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 7/8/2009. (Proujansky, Josh)
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 85 AMENDED ORDER: Re: Motion to withdraw. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 3/19/2009. (DeVeaux, Yvonne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freund v. Weinstein et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Freund
Represented By: Stephen Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Gindi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Hager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bushwick Enterprise Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siforov, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quick 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?