Harris v. Queens County District Attorney's Office et al
Plaintiff: Tamara M. Harris
Defendant: Queens County District Attorney's Office, Richard Brown, Joan Ritter, John Ryan, Jim Quinn, Laura Henigman, N.Y. State Unified Court System-Office of Court Administration and Hunter
Case Number: 1:2008cv01703
Filed: April 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Carol B. Amon
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 150 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Defendants' application for costs is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to tax Plaintiff in the amount of $4,624.34. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 2/20/2013. (Lee, Margaret)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART as to 95 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court declines to adopt the Report and Recommendations with respect to 69 Hunter's Motion for Summary Judgment, which is denied. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendations with respect to 86 the DA Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, which is granted in part and denied in part. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 3/12/2012. (Amon, Carol).
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 34 : The application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 12/14/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER, The Court shall hold a pretrial status conference on 12/14/09 at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom #11A. Deft Hunter shall answer all claims that were not dismissed by 11/30/09. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 11/13/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
November 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER (ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION): This Court has received the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, dated 9/15/2009, recommending that this Court deny Defendant's 19 moti on to dismiss with respect to Plaintiff's claim that she was denied access to the courthouse in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Plaintiff's state law claim for defamation. Magistrate Ju dge Bloom further recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's remaining claims should be granted. As no party has objected, the Court hereby adopts the 27 Report and Recommendation of September 15, 2009 as the opinion of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 11/9/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Queens County District Attorney's Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara M. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Queens County District Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan Ritter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura Henigman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N.Y. State Unified Court System-Office of Court Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?