Frazier v. Marshall

Frazier v. Marshall

Petitioner:	Hector Frazier
Respondent:	Luis Marshall
Case Number:	1:2008cv01737
Filed:	April 21, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 2, 2012	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, petitioner's habeas petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to dismiss this petition, send a c opy of the judgment and this Order to petitioner, and close the case. A certificate of appealability shall not be issued as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/2/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 2, 2012

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, petitioner's habeas petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to dismiss this petition, send a c opy of the judgment and this Order to petitioner, and close the case. A certificate of appealability shall not be issued as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/2/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frazier v. Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hector Frazier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Luis Marshall
Represented By:	QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?