Santiago v. C.O. Jane Doe et al
| Tomas Santiago |
| C.O. Jane Doe and C.O. M. Rohan |
| 1:2008cv01961 |
| May 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 6/30/2010. C/M w/appeals package forwarded to plaintiff. (Manuel, Germaine)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, that Pltff shall submit any materials that he would like the Court to consider in opposition to the Defts' summary judgment motion by 6/21/10. Defts shall serve and file their reply. if any, by 7/1/10. If pltff wishes to request discovery, he must notify the Court and the Defts by 6/14/10 of his intent to do so and shall specify the items of discovery that he seeks. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 5/21/2010) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
