Rienzi & Sons, Inc. v. N. Puglisi & F. Industria Paste Alimentari S.P.A. et al
| Rienzi & Sons, Inc. |
| N. Puglisi & F. Industria Paste Alimentari S.P.A. and Francesco Pulejo |
| 1:2008cv02540 |
| June 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Kings |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 98 Motion to Compel. In light of the bankruptcy stay, Puglisi's motion to compel is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 3/4/2015. (Williams, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER re 90 Letter filed by Francesco Pulejo, N. Puglisi & F. Industria Paste Alimentari S.P.A. -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Puglisi's motion for the entry of judgment on the remaining claim a nd dispensing with trial is granted. At the pretrial conference held on February 13, 2015, the Court directed the parties to submit a proposed judgment to the Court for its endorsement on February 17, 2015, which was done. Said judgment was entered on February 17, 2015 and the case closed. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 2/18/2015. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 76 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the granting of defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings, including settlement discussions, and, if such discussions are not fruitful, for the preparation of a joint pretrial order consistent with my Individual Rules and Practices. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/27/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in favor of Puglisi on Rienzi's claims for breach of fiduciary duty (First Claim), breach of contract for delaying and ultimately ceasing pasta shipments (Second Claim), breach of contract for failing to reimburse legal fees (Fourth Claim), and breach of joint venture (Fifth Claim). In addition, summary judgment is granted in favor of Puglisi on its counterclaim and in favor of Pulejo on Rienzi's claim for breach of fiduciary duty (First Claim). As such, Claims One, Two, Four, and Five are dismissed. This case shall proceed on Claim Three and Puglisi's Counterclaim. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings, including settlement discussions. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 5/16/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER re 56 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, filed by N. Puglisi & F. Industria Paste Alimentari S.P.A. -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff Puglisi's appeal from two decisions of the magistrate judge is dismissed and the magistrate judge's decisions are affirmed. This case is trial ready. The parties are to file a joint pretrial order consistent with the court's Memorandum and Order and in accord with my Individual Rules and Practices NO LATER THAN MAY 31, 2011 for my approval. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/30/2011. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
