Fleming v. Grosvenor et al
| Michael Fleming |
| Paul Grosvenor, John B. Mattingly, Mtonya Flecher, Michelle Mullins, Police Officer Hernandez, Police Officer Liautaud, John Doe 1-4, Jane Doe 1-2 and New York City |
| 1:2008cv03074 |
| July 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' 92 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in its entirety. Because defendants are otherwise entitled to Summary Judgment on all claims, the Court need not address their remaining, alternative arguments for the dismissal of the case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/6/2012. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 USC sec. 636(b)(1). Therefore, pltff's complaint as to deft David Camacho is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the FRCP. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 9/10/2010) c/m by chambers. (See Service List attached) (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
