Crawford v. Lutheran Medical Center

Crawford v. Lutheran Medical Center

Plaintiff:	Doris D. Crawford
Defendant:	Lutheran Medical Center
Case Number:	1:2008cv03429
Filed:	September 4, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Nicholas G. Garaufis
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2011	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Pltff has failed to allege a plausible claim to relief on her disparate treatment and hostile work environment claims. Morever, the factual contentions underlying those claims are cleary baseless. Pltff has, however, sufficient ly pleaded a claim for retaliation in violation of Title VII. Consequently, Dft's motion to dismiss is Denied as to pltff's retaliation claim, and granted as to all other claims. (Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/9/2011) C/M to pro se. (Piper, Francine)
February 8, 2010	Filing 28 ORDER: The Court held a conference in this case on 2/8/2010, and granted plaintiff one final opportunity to serve her opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss on defendant's counsel by 2/23/2010. Defendant shall serve its reply, if any, and electronically file plaintiff's opposition along with the reply by 3/2/2010. If plaintiff fails to oppose the motion by 2/23/2010, defendant shall notify the Court by letter and the Court shall consider defendant's motion unopposed. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 2/8/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2011

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Pltff has failed to allege a plausible claim to relief on her disparate treatment and hostile work environment claims. Morever, the factual contentions underlying those claims are cleary baseless. Pltff has, however, sufficient ly pleaded a claim for retaliation in violation of Title VII. Consequently, Dft's motion to dismiss is Denied as to pltff's retaliation claim, and granted as to all other claims. (Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/9/2011) C/M to pro se. (Piper, Francine)

February 8, 2010

Filing 28 ORDER: The Court held a conference in this case on 2/8/2010, and granted plaintiff one final opportunity to serve her opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss on defendant's counsel by 2/23/2010. Defendant shall serve its reply, if any, and electronically file plaintiff's opposition along with the reply by 3/2/2010. If plaintiff fails to oppose the motion by 2/23/2010, defendant shall notify the Court by letter and the Court shall consider defendant's motion unopposed. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 2/8/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crawford v. Lutheran Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris D. Crawford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lutheran Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?