Williams v. Bloomberg et al
| Annis Williams |
| Michael R. Bloomberg, Robert Doar, Verna Eggleston, Ms. McAllister, Ms. B. Miller, Ms. Jones, Mr. Collin Rose, Mr. Kee, Mr. Prooverbs, John Doe 1 and Jane Doe, Raymond Kelly and Mr. Rao and John Doe 2 |
| 1:2008cv04010 |
| November 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER, Neither party has filed any objection to the R&R. Pursuant to 28 USC sec. 636(b) and the FRCP 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that defts' 32 Motion to Dismiss the complaint is GRANTED. Adopting Report and Recommendations as to 33 Report and Recommendations. (Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 1/8/2010) c/m Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, For the following reasons, it is respectfully recommended that defts' motion under REule 37(b)(2)(A)(v) should be granted and pltff's case should be dismissed. The parties shall have 14 days from service of this R&R to file written objections. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 12/14/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
