Valerio v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Valerio v. Commissioner of Social Security

Valerio v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Teresa A. Valerio
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2008cv04253
Filed:	October 20, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Charles P. Sifton
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 3, 2009	Filing 24 STIPULATION & ORDER REGARDING FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2412 re 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant that Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $6, 118.56 (Six Thousand One Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents) in attorney fees and expenses, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in full satisfaction of any claim under that statute, and in accordance with the Assignment executed by Plaintiff on 9/5/08. (So Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/2/2009). C-E/M. (Layne, Monique)
August 6, 2009	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings, denying defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings and remanding the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for the calculation of benefits. Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 8/5/2009. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. (Sifton, Charles)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 3, 2009

Filing 24 STIPULATION & ORDER REGARDING FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2412 re 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant that Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $6, 118.56 (Six Thousand One Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents) in attorney fees and expenses, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in full satisfaction of any claim under that statute, and in accordance with the Assignment executed by Plaintiff on 9/5/08. (So Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/2/2009). C-E/M. (Layne, Monique)

August 6, 2009

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings, denying defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings and remanding the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for the calculation of benefits. Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 8/5/2009. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. (Sifton, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valerio v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa A. Valerio
Represented By:	Richard P. Morris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?