Delia et al v. The Leverage Group et al
Ann Marie Delia, Robert Sweeney, Veronica Sweeney, Tara Sroka and Ludvig Haugedal |
The Leverage Group, Leverage Option Management Co., Inc., North American Financial, Philip Barry, LLC and Philip Barry |
1:2008cv04758 |
November 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Securities/Commodities Office |
Kings |
Steven M. Gold |
Charles P. Sifton |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER Plaintiffs moved the Court for an Order of Attachment pursuant to Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Article 62 of New York Civil Practice Law and Rules. The Court has found that, (1) Plaintiffs have a cause of action against t he Defendants; (2) Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their cause of action; (3) grounds for attachment exist because Defendants have assigned, disposed of, encumbered or secreted property, or are about to do so, with the intent to def raud creditors or frustrate the enforcement of a judgment that might be rendered in Plaintiffs favor; (4) the amount Plaintiffs demand from Defendants exceeds all counterclaims known to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' motion for an order of attachment is granted. See attached for further details.Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 2/2/2009. (Sifton, Charles) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.