Meyer v. Ahmad et al
Iris Meyer |
Rafik Ahmad and Shareef General Construction, LLC |
1:2008cv05147 |
December 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Torts to Land Office |
Kings |
Roanne L. Mann |
Jack B. Weinstein |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 32 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Iris Meyer. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 9/28/2010. (Judgment Clerk cc-ed.) (Barrett, C) |
Filing 34 ORDER: The 26 October 1, 2009 Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is adopted on the merits, in the absence of timely objection by defendant Shareef General Construction, LLC ("SGC"). Plaintiff's 14 motion for a defau lt judgment against defendant SGC is granted. Plaintiff's 14 motion for a default judgment against defendant Ahmad is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed default judgment against defendant SGC consistent with the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 3/16/2010. (Barrett, C) |
Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 MOTION for Default Judgment as to defendants filed by Iris Meyer. Objections to R&R due by 10/15/2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 10/1/2009. (Mann, Roanne) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.