Maldonado et al v. Hapag-Lloyd Ships, Ltd. et al
| Francisco Maldonado and Bridgette Maldonado |
| Hapag-Lloyd Ships, Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd A.G., Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GMBH, Tui A.G., New York Container Terminal, Inc., Howland Hook Container Terminal, Inc. and M/V New Orleans Express |
| 1:2009cv00018 |
| January 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Marine Office |
| Kings |
| Frederic Block |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 5/1/2015. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, the stevedore defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Accordingly, the claims of plaintiffs Francisco Maldonado and Bridgette Maldonado, the cross cl aims of Hapag-Lloyd Ships, Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd A.G. and Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GMBH against New York Container Terminal, Inc. and Howland Hook Container Terminal Inc. and the cross claims of New York Container Terminal, Inc. and Howland Hook Container Terminal against Hapag-Lloyd Ships, Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd A.G., and Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GMBH are hereby dismissed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 3/31/2015. (Moo-Young, Jillian)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
