Boyle v. New York Legislature et al
| William Boyle |
| New York Legislature, New York City, NYC Department of Finance and Nyc Parking Violations Bureau |
| 1:2009cv00385 |
| February 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City of New York is permitted to proceed. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons against the City of New York and the United States Marshals Service is d irected to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, the Court's 2/17/2009 Order, and this Order on this defendant without prepayment of fees. A courtesy copy of the same documents also shall be served on the Corporation Counsel for the C ity of New York. The case is referred to the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan, on 3/17/2009) C/mailed. (Courtesy Copy sent to Corporation Counsel via regular mail) Inter-Off. Svc. upon the U.S.M.S. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
