Orellana v. World Courier, Inc. et al
| Mario E. Orellana |
| World Courier, Inc., Michael Connolly, Kenny Cedel, Mike Singh, Kroll, Quest Diagnostic, Aaron C. Polk, Jr. and Workplace Compliance |
| 1:2009cv00576 |
| February 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 43 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Mario E. Orellana. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against WC is DENIED. Plaintiff's voluntary motion to withdraw all claims against Aaron C. Polk without prejudice is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/24/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Reconsideration re 65 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/25/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. for 33 Motion to Dismiss filed by Kroll. Accordingly, Kroll's motion to dismiss is granted. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/29/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
