Baez v. Jet Blue Airways et al
Plaintiff: Rosalinda Baez
Defendant: Jet Blue Airways and Tiffany "Doe"
Case Number: 1:2009cv00596
Filed: February 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge: Charles P. Sifton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Non-party witness John Marzulli (Marzulli), a reporter for the New York Daily News, moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and 45(c)(3) to quash or modify a deposition subpoena served on him by plaintiff Rosalinda Baez (plaintiff or Baez). For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, the motion is granted.. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 11/9/2012. (Marino, Janine)
October 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Defendant JetBlue Airways' Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 46 Defendant Tiffany Malabet's Motion to Dismiss; and denying 38 Defendant JetBlue Airway's Motion for Sanctions. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 10/15/2010. (Sherkow, Jacob)
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, defendant Jetblue's motion to dismiss is granted. To the extent any amendment would not be futile, plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this decision. If plaintiff seeks to assert diversity jurisdiction, she must either plead the domicile of defendant Doe, or dismiss Doe from the case. The pending motion by Jetblue to dismiss the complaint against Doe for failure to effect proper service is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 8/3/2009. (Abdallah, Fida)
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting defendant Jetblues motion for dismissal and, to the extent any amendment would not be futile, granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. The motion by defendant Tiffany Doe for dismissal of the complaint for failure to effect proper service is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton on 7/29/2009. (Sifton, Charles)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baez v. Jet Blue Airways et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalinda Baez
Represented By: Jon L. Norinsberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jet Blue Airways
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tiffany "Doe"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?