Gomez v. The City of New York
Plaintiff: Deyanira Gomez
Defendant: The City of New York
Case Number: 1:2009cv00620
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge: I. Leo Glasser
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's federal claims and dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's state law claims. Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/30/2012. (Green, Dana)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deyanira Gomez
Represented By: Eric Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?