White v. Bellnier

White v. Bellnier

Petitioner:	Gary White
Respondent:	Joseph F. Bellnier
Case Number:	1:2009cv00744
Filed:	August 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Allyne R. Ross
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 27, 2011	Filing 16 ORDER & OPINION: The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. Because petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. In addition, this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 12/23/2011. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
April 26, 2010	Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this Order to: (1) show good cause why he failed to exhaust his ineffective assistance of counsel claims prior to filing his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) address the merits of his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims so the Court can determine whether a stay is warranted. Petitioner is also directed to provide the Court with the status of his Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 4/23/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 27, 2011

Filing 16 ORDER & OPINION: The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. Because petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. In addition, this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 12/23/2011. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

April 26, 2010

Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this Order to: (1) show good cause why he failed to exhaust his ineffective assistance of counsel claims prior to filing his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) address the merits of his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims so the Court can determine whether a stay is warranted. Petitioner is also directed to provide the Court with the status of his Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 4/23/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Bellnier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gary White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph F. Bellnier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?