El v. 2000 New Century Travel, Inc.

El v. 2000 New Century Travel, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Nanya-Amir El
Defendant:	2000 New Century Travel, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2009cv00798
Filed:	February 26, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Other Statutory Actions Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1331 Fed. Question

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 24, 2009	Filing 8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, pro se plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this court's dismissal of the complaint is denied in its entirety. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (196 2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum and Order to Pro SE Plaintiff. This case was previously closed. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/24/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)
March 27, 2009	Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING ORIGINAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED SUMMARY ORDER, the original complaint and the amended complaint are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (h)(3); s ee 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and Cruz v. Gomez, 202 F.3d 593, 596 (2d Cir. 2000). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied f or the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Summary Order to pro se plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/27/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 24, 2009

Filing 8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, pro se plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this court's dismissal of the complaint is denied in its entirety. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (196 2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum and Order to Pro SE Plaintiff. This case was previously closed. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/24/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)

March 27, 2009

Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING ORIGINAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED SUMMARY ORDER, the original complaint and the amended complaint are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (h)(3); s ee 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and Cruz v. Gomez, 202 F.3d 593, 596 (2d Cir. 2000). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied f or the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Summary Order to pro se plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/27/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: El v. 2000 New Century Travel, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nanya-Amir El
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 2000 New Century Travel, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?