Gesualdi et al v. K&W Logistics LLC
| Thomas Gesualdi and Frank Finkel |
| K&W Logistics LLC |
| 1:2009cv01605 |
| April 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| I. Leo Glasser |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, RE 12 . Based on the foregoing, a finding of civil contempt is made against the defendant and Ann Assing. The sanction imposed for that finding is a fine of $1,000 levied against them jointly and severally for each day o f disobedience of the Court's Order. In addition, an examination of the time sheets of the firm of Cohen, Weiss and Simon, annexed as Exhibit N to the Adler Declaration, warrants the assessment of attorney's fees and costs in the sum of $3,959.02 against the defendant and Ann Assing, jointly and severally, as being eminently reasonable. This Order is stayed until 5:00 p.m. on February 27, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 2/23/2012. (Layne, Monique)
|
|
Filing
5
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION in favor of Frank Finkel, Thomas Gesualdi against K&W Logistics LLC, in the amount of $72,027.65, plus costs and disbursements in the sum of $435.00, totaling $72,462.65 and that plaintiffs have execution therfore. (Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 5/29/09) (Piper, Francine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
