Mineo v. City of New York et al
Michael Mineo |
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Richard Kern, Alex Cruz, Andrew Morales, Noel Jugraj and John Doe Police Officers 1-5 |
1:2009cv02261 |
May 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Kings |
Marilyn D. Go |
Jack B. Weinstein |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 349 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly,it is hereby ordered that Mineo's action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment; mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order and the accompanying Judgment to plaintiff Michael Mineo, both at theaddress listed on the docket and via email to Sydney Mitchel, Mineo's self-designated intermediary, at mannyvega2005@yahoo.com; note the mailings on the docket; and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 2/9/2018. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 316 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 301 Motion to Bifurcate; granting 304 Motion to Bifurcate for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order. The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report by April 12, 2013 advising the Court of the remaining issues that need to be resolved prior to trial. Upon receipt of the parties filing, the Court will schedule a status conference. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2013. (Mauskopf, Roslynn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.