Wright v. New York State et al
| Earl Wright |
| New York State, New York State Criminal Justice Services, New York City, New York City Police Department, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 |
| 1:2009cv02452 |
| June 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Carol B. Amon |
| Lois Bloom |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants' 67 supplemental motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to all remaining claims and defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to dismiss this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 9/14/2012. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 58 granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed Judge Bloom's R&R and Plaintiff's objections, the Court hereby adopts Judge Bloom's conclusions and analysis to the extent consistent with this Memorandum and Order. Further, defendants are hereby ordered to submit supplemental briefing within thirty (30) days as to whether summary judgment should be granted on the remaining claims. Plaintiff's response is due on or before December 1, 2011. Plaintiff's request for additional discovery is denied at this time. (Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff). Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/29/2011. (Amon, Carol)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: The Court held a pretrial conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 by telephone on 4/13/2010 and urged the parties to discuss settlement. The Court set June 30, 2010 as the deadline for the parties to complete all discovery. Before req uesting the Court's assistance regarding a discovery dispute, the parties must make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute with one another. If defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment, defendants' counsel shall write to Judge Amon by 7/30/2010 to request permission to move and shall state the basis for the motion and propose a briefing schedule. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 4/13/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 23 proposed Order to Show Cause is denied. The Court's 24 Order of Referral to Magistrate Judge Bloom for Report and Recommendation on plaintiff's Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order filed 12/18/2009, is vacated. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 1/6/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On 10/13/2009, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint and attached thereto an order to show cause for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order seeking to enjoin defendants' use of his DNA sample that he alleges was obtained illegally. Here, plaintiff has not made the requisite showing for such relief; i.e., plaintiff has neither demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor made a showing of irreparable harm. Accordingly, plaintiff's 13 proposed order to show cause is denied. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 10/20/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
