Klos v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Klos v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

Klos v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

Plaintiff:	Patricia Klos
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Secuity
Case Number:	1:2009cv03039
Filed:	July 7, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Allyne R. Ross
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 30, 2010	Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 11 motion for appointment of counsel, is denied because plaintiff has not made an adequate showing that appointment of counsel is warranted in this matter. For the reasons set herein, the Administrative La w Judge correctly applied the appropriate legal standards and there was substantial evidence supporting the Commissioner's decision that plaintiff was not disabled at any time through 12/31/2005. The defendant's 14 motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and plaintiff's motion seeking reversal of the Commissioner's decision is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 8/30/2010) C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
January 19, 2010	Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER: The record before the court does not warrant appointment of counsel because it is unclear whether plaintiff's claims have merit. The court grants plaintiff an extension of time until 2/15/2010 to respond to defendant's m otion. After the court reviews plaintiff's response to defendant's motion, the court will decide whether plaintiff has made an adequate showing that appointment of counsel is warranted in this matter. Plaintiff is directed to serve her resp onse papers upon the defendant by 2/15/2010, and defendant shall thereafter file the entire set of motion papers and the administrative record with the court. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 1/19/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 30, 2010

Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 11 motion for appointment of counsel, is denied because plaintiff has not made an adequate showing that appointment of counsel is warranted in this matter. For the reasons set herein, the Administrative La w Judge correctly applied the appropriate legal standards and there was substantial evidence supporting the Commissioner's decision that plaintiff was not disabled at any time through 12/31/2005. The defendant's 14 motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and plaintiff's motion seeking reversal of the Commissioner's decision is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 8/30/2010) C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

January 19, 2010

Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER: The record before the court does not warrant appointment of counsel because it is unclear whether plaintiff's claims have merit. The court grants plaintiff an extension of time until 2/15/2010 to respond to defendant's m otion. After the court reviews plaintiff's response to defendant's motion, the court will decide whether plaintiff has made an adequate showing that appointment of counsel is warranted in this matter. Plaintiff is directed to serve her resp onse papers upon the defendant by 2/15/2010, and defendant shall thereafter file the entire set of motion papers and the administrative record with the court. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 1/19/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klos v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Klos
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Secuity
Represented By:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?