Lyon v. Lyon et al
| Loretta Lyon |
| Dennis Lyon and Becky Genovesi |
| 1:2009cv03609 |
| July 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; AND DENYING 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, pro se plaintiff's request to proceed in forma paup eris is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for the purposes of this and the Attached Written Order, and her request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot in light of the court's dismissal of the complaint in its entirety. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962). This action is DISMISSED. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum and Order to pro se plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/22/2010. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
