Tavarez v. Artus

Tavarez v. Artus

Petitioner:	Daniel Tavarez
Respondent:	Dale Artus
Case Number:	1:2009cv03716
Filed:	August 24, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Carol B. Amon
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 10, 2012	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM & ORDER DISMISSING PETITION: The Petitioner has not met his burden of establishing that the state court's denial of his various claims for relief was "was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law." Accordingly, the 1 Habeas Petition is denied. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue because there has been no "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 7/10/2012. C/mailed to pro se Petitioner. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
November 30, 2009	Filing 8 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 6 : This application to reconsider its earlier decision denying appointment of counsel is denied. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 11/30/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 10, 2012

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM & ORDER DISMISSING PETITION: The Petitioner has not met his burden of establishing that the state court's denial of his various claims for relief was "was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law." Accordingly, the 1 Habeas Petition is denied. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue because there has been no "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 7/10/2012. C/mailed to pro se Petitioner. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

November 30, 2009

Filing 8 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 6 : This application to reconsider its earlier decision denying appointment of counsel is denied. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 11/30/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tavarez v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Tavarez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dale Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?