Finkel v. Metropolitan Sign & Maintence Corp.
Plaintiff: Gerald Finkel
Defendant: Metropolitan Sign & Maintence Corp.
Case Number: 1:2009cv04416
Filed: October 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Sterling Johnson
Presiding Judge: Cheryl L. Pollak
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Gerald Finkel, 21 Report and Recommendations. (SEE ATTACHED). Ordered by Senior Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 10/4/2010. (Rocco, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finkel v. Metropolitan Sign & Maintence Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Finkel
Represented By: Michael Seth Adler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Sign & Maintence Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?