Dennis v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Dennis v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Dennis v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Petitioner:	Roger Anthony Dennis
Respondent:	Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Case Number:	1:2009cv04513
Filed:	October 20, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Sandra L. Townes
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 12, 2009	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Petitioner fails to identify any matter or controlling decision that the Court has overlooked. Nor does he point to any intervening change in the law, new evidence, clear error, or a manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Petitioner's 5 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 11/10/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
October 23, 2009	Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, For the reasons stated herein, the Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915, and the Petition is dismissed. The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the Petition. The C ourt certifies pursuant to 28 USc sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/21/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 12, 2009

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Petitioner fails to identify any matter or controlling decision that the Court has overlooked. Nor does he point to any intervening change in the law, new evidence, clear error, or a manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Petitioner's 5 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 11/10/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)

October 23, 2009

Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, For the reasons stated herein, the Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915, and the Petition is dismissed. The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the Petition. The C ourt certifies pursuant to 28 USc sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/21/2009) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dennis v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Roger Anthony Dennis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?