New Falls Corporation v. Lall
| 1:2009cv04809 |
| November 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by New Falls Corporation. The court awards New Falls $149,472.39, plus an additional $29.76 in interest per day from June 10,2010 through the entry of final judgment under the terms of the Loan Agreements, and post-judgment interest from the date of judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/2/2010. (c/m to pro se; fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, Pltff's motion for summary judgment as to liability is GRANTED and the case is referred to Magistrate Judge Reyes for an inquest on damages. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/18/2010. Copy mailed to Ramnarine J. Lall. (Abdallah, Fida)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: New Falls Corporation v. Lall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
