Rodriguez v. Internal Revenue Service
1:2009cv05337 |
December 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Freedom of Information Act Office |
Raymond J. Dearie |
Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
05:552 Freedom of Information Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On 4/16/13, Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky recommended that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and that plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. Neither party filed objections. This Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's Report and Recommendation in full, for the reasons stated in his Recommendation. Forwarded for judgment. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 5/13/2013. (Chee, Alvin) |
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's careful analysis and plaintiff's objections, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in full. Defendant is directed to produce all of the withheld documents to the Court for in camera review, consistent with Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's recommendation. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 9/24/2012. (Chee, Alvin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.