Rodriguez v. Internal Revenue Service

Case Number: 1:2009cv05337
Filed: December 7, 2009
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Freedom of Information Act Office
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Referring Judge: Viktor V. Pohorelsky
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2013 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On 4/16/13, Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky recommended that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and that plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. Neither party filed objections. This Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's Report and Recommendation in full, for the reasons stated in his Recommendation. Forwarded for judgment. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 5/13/2013. (Chee, Alvin)
September 24, 2012 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's careful analysis and plaintiff's objections, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in full. Defendant is directed to produce all of the withheld documents to the Court for in camera review, consistent with Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's recommendation. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 9/24/2012. (Chee, Alvin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?