Hewitt v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Hewitt v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Hewitt v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Case Number:	1:2009cv05705
Filed:	December 29, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Roanne L. Mann
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2012	Filing 27 ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss" For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with regard to plaintiff's remaining Title VII and NYSHRL claims, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, and to close the case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
December 7, 2010	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's retaliation claim and Title VII discrimination claim based on termination are therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Title VII and New York state law claims as to discrimination based on her reinstat ement to a non-supervisory position without back pay are DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty days as set forth above. It must be titled "AMENDED COMPLAINT" and bear the docket number 09-CV -05705 (RRM)(RLM). If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within this time period, the Complaint may be dismissed with prejudice and judgment may enter. So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/6/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2012

Filing 27 ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss" For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with regard to plaintiff's remaining Title VII and NYSHRL claims, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, and to close the case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

December 7, 2010

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's retaliation claim and Title VII discrimination claim based on termination are therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Title VII and New York state law claims as to discrimination based on her reinstat ement to a non-supervisory position without back pay are DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty days as set forth above. It must be titled "AMENDED COMPLAINT" and bear the docket number 09-CV -05705 (RRM)(RLM). If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within this time period, the Complaint may be dismissed with prejudice and judgment may enter. So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/6/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hewitt v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?