B.H. et al v. City Of New York et al
1:2010cv00210 |
January 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Andrew L. Carter |
Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 381 ORDER denying 369 Motion for Sanctions and to Compel Discovery. See attached Order for details. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 4/7/2014. (Gold, Steven) |
Filing 363 ORDER denying 337 Motion for Reconsideration. See attached Order. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 1/14/2014. (Gold, Steven) |
Filing 318 ORDER re 272 MOTION for Sanctions concerning the deposition of A.M. filed by City of New York, dismissing the claims asserted by M.M. for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 9/30/2013. (Gold, Steven) |
Filing 96 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion for Reconsideration (SEE ATTACHED). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/20/2011. (Figeroux, Davina) |
Filing 84 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Compel (SEE ATTACHED). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 5/27/2011. (Figeroux, Davina) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: B.H. et al v. City Of New York et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.