Jameson v. NYSED VESID et al
Plaintiff: Richard L. Jameson
Defendant: NYS Education Department, NYSED VESID and NYS Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2010cv00847
Filed: February 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; denying 26 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss 33 is GRANTED, and all of Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED. F urther, Plaintiff request for leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint 26 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly, mail a copy of the judgment and this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff pro se, and close this case. Th e Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/20/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff is granted 30 days' leave to re-plead and file a 3rd Amended Complaint alleging whether he received an impartial due process hearing by VESID and whether a hearing officer issued a final decision. Plaintiff should attach all documents demonstrating that he received a final decision by a hearing officer, including a copy of the decision, if available. Plaintiff should provide all relevant dates, and his allegations in his 3rd amended complaint must be concise. No summonses will issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days until Plaintiff has complied with this Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 7/19/2010. C/M (Manuel, Germaine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jameson v. NYSED VESID et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYS Education Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYSED VESID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYS Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard L. Jameson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?