Bailey v. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2010cv00865
Filed: March 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Attorney Fees - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and costs is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff& #039;s motion for attorney's fees is granted to the extent that she may be awarded fees and denied in part as to the hourly fee that plaintiff's counsel is entitled to assess. Plaintiff is directed to file an affidavit recalculating the at torney's fees using a separate hourly rate for the work performed in each year, as set forth on the Court's Attached Written Memorandum and Order, no later than June 14, 2013. The motion for costs in the amount of $766.26, consisting of $350 for filing fees, $130 for service costs, $281.26 for electronic research fees, and $5 for postage, is also granted. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 5/31/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?