Morangelli et al v. Chemed Corporation et al
Case Number: 1:2010cv00876
Filed: February 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Brian M. Cogan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 270 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendant's motion for reconsideration 264 is granted in part and denied in part. See attached document for further details. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/25/2013. (Siegfried, Evan)
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 261 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' motion to amend the Class Certification Order 257 and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment 231 are denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment and/or decertification of the class and collective actions 235 is granted in part and denied in part. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/1/2013. (Siegfried, Evan)
July 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 211 ORDER re 207 Defendants' motion for reconsideration. Motion granted. See attached decision. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/8/2011. (Cogan, Brian)
January 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER 184 filed by Anthony Morangelli. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/1/2011. (Cogan, Brian)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morangelli et al v. Chemed Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?