Clark Street Wine and Spirits et al v. Emporos Systems Corporation
| 88 Seventh Avenue, Inc. and Clark Street Wine and Spirits |
| Emporos Systems Corporation |
| 1:2010cv01392 |
| March 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Emporos Systems Corporation's 14 Motion to Dismiss. A trial date will be set for early May, 2011. On consent, the jury will be chosen by the magistrate judge. A pretrial hearing before the court will be set one we ek before the trial. The parties will provide lists of witnesses, exhibits, and proposed charges one week before this pretrial hearing. All in limine motions will be heard at that time. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 11/24/2010. (Barrett, C)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: At the hearing on defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6), scheduled for November 4,2010, at 10:30, the parties shall be prepared to address the outlined factual issues. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 9/21/2010. (Barrett, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
