Wong v. 1st Discount Brokerage Inc.
Plaintiff: Man Fong Wong
Defendant: 1st Discount Brokerage Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv01487
Filed: April 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Cheryl L. Pollak
Presiding Judge: Eric N. Vitaliano
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: The Court adopts the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the defendant's motion to compel arbitration is granted. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 3/30/2011. (Fwd'd for judgment) (Brucella, Michelle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wong v. 1st Discount Brokerage Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1st Discount Brokerage Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Man Fong Wong
Represented By: John J. O'Connell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?