Brill v. Queens Lumber Co., Inc. et al
| William Brill |
| Queens Lumber Co., Inc. and Eric Jose Vigil |
| 1:2010cv01975 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth within the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/27/2013. (Olson, Kristin)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM and ORDER re 20 Defendant Vigil from testifying at trial. The Court denies plaintiff's motion to strike Vigil's Answer and enter default at this time, without prejudice to filing a formal motion along with the certification ma ndated by Rule 37(d)(2). The Court grants plaintiff's motion for sanctions against defendant Queens Lumber for submitting improperly certified interrogatory responses. Defendant Queens Lumber is Ordered to pay plaintiff the reasonable attorney 's fees and costs incurred as a result of defendant's error. Plaintiff is directed to submit an accounting of his fees and costs, along with supporting documentation, by 2/24/12. Opposition papers must be filed by 3/2/12. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 2/10/2012. (Caggiano, Diana)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
