De Meo v. Santangelo et al
| Michael De Meo |
| Marie Dale, Thomas Dale, Marie Morelli, Stephano Morelli, Anthony Pepe, Barbara Pepe, Carol Santangelo and Vito Santangelo |
| 1:2010cv02276 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, The court has reviewed Mag. Orenstein's thorough and well-reasoned R&R and the record for clear and found none. Therefore, the court adopts the R&R in its entirety, and notes that by the parties failur e to object, they have waived further judicial review of this order. See Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd, Carwile, PC., 596 F.3d 84,92(2d Cir. 2010)(" A party waives appellate review of a decision in a magis trate judge's Report and Recommendation if the party fails to file timely objections designating the particular issue.") Accordingly, the court grants dft's motions and dismisses the Amended Complaint in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case. (Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/25/2011) C/M to All Pro Se Plaintiffs and Defendants. (forwarded for judgment) (Piper, Francine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
