McMillan v. New York State Board of Elections et al
| James E. McMillan, III |
| New York City Board of Elections and New York State Board of Elections |
| 1:2010cv02502 |
| June 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| John Gleeson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING CASE : For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, the State Board's motion to dismiss, 27 , is granted. The City Board's motion to dismiss, 25 , is granted with respect to all claims for damages accruing prior to June 2, 2007, and with respect to plaintiff's claim for permanent injunctive relief. With respect to all remaining claims, the City Board's motion to dismiss is treated as a motion for summary judgment and is granted. The Clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment for the defendants and to close the case. A copy of this order and memorandum will be mailed to plaintiff. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 10/15/2010. (Horowitz, Hayley)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the motion for a preliminary injunction is denied as moot given the parties' agreement that "Rent is 2 Damn High" is an appropriate way for plaintiff's party name to appear on the ballot. A copy of the Order will be mailed to plaintiff. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 6/25/2010. (MacMahon, Paul)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
