Liang v. City of New York et al
| Gary Liang |
| City of New York, Lieutenant Conforti, Albert Hawkins, Jane Doe, John Doe, Raymond Kelly, Brian J. Maquire, Sergeant Michetti, Sergeant Natoli, New York City Police Department, Officer, Detective Shim, Da Peng Song, Yi Jing Tan, Detective Christopher Vaughn, Bei Wang, Xin Xu and Detective Robert Zee |
| 1:2010cv03089 |
| July 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's § 1983, § 1985, RICO and state law claims against all non-City defendants are dismissed with prejudice. The case, with its sole extant claim, remains respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky for his continued pre-trial management. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/29/2014. (Fernandez, Erica)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The 53 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of New York City and its defendant employees is granted. All claims against them are dismissed, except for Liang's § 1983 claim for unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. That claim survives, but only as to defendants Zee, Hawkins, Shim, Vaughn, Conforti, and Michetti. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/18/2013. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
