Betters Homes Depot Inc. v. Whyte et al
| Betters Homes Depot Inc. |
| Elma Gibbs, Everette Weaver and Coleen Whyte |
| 1:2010cv03246 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Carol B. Amon |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court concludes that removal should not be permitted and the action is hereby remanded, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4), to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, Index No. 25309/05. Petitioner Weaver's proposed order to show cause is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to immediately send a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings and to close the case in this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Although petitioner paid the filing fee to commence this proceeding, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon on 7/21/2010. (Abdallah, Fida)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
