Scrubb v. LaValley
Petitioner: Anderson Scrubb
Respondent: Thomas LaValley
Case Number: 1:2010cv03286
Filed: July 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Carol B. Amon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying petitioner's 34 Motion for Reconsideration. So Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 7/10/2015. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
November 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Having reconsidered the R&R de novo in light of Scrubb's objections, the Court again adopts the R&R and denies habeas relief. Since Scrubb has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional ri ght," a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and to close the case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 11/24/2014. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court will now consider Scrubb's motion for reconsideration on the merits. Scrubb shall file any papers supporting his Rule 60(b) motion and objecting to the R&R by May 29, 2014. The government shall file any response by June 30, 2014. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 4/29/2014. c/m to pro se petitioner (Fernandez, Erica)
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the record and, finding no clear error, hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Orenstein's R&R as the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, the Court denies Scrubb's pe tition for a writ of habeas corpus. Since Scrubb has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and to close the case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/30/2013. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scrubb v. LaValley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas LaValley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anderson Scrubb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?