GUSTAVE et al v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
| Edwina K. Gustave and Merande S. Gustave |
| Lee Benjamin, City of New York, Civilian complaint review board, Criminal Court of the City of New York, Marconi, New York City Police Department, North shore hospital - long island jewish health system, Parole Officer Washington and Zanleone |
| 1:2010cv03314 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| I. Leo Glasser |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Any appeal must be filed within thirty days after judgment is entered in this case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment dismissing this action and close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/5/2012. C/M. (Fwd'd for judgment) (Brucella, Michelle)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER re 68 Letter. E. Gustaves requests are denied for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, as well as the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Mann's Orders dated October 6, 2010 40 and December 6, 2010 53 , and this c ourt's Orders dated November 16, 2010 50 , December 10, 2010, and April 11, 2011. Plaintiffs are hereby notified that additional applications for the same relief will not be granted, and may subject them to sanctions. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on plaintiffs and to note the service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 7/29/2011. (Winterkorn, Margaret)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons indicated in the attached Memorandum and Order, plaintiffs' objections to the portions of Magistrate Judge Mann's October 6, 2010 Memorandum and Order granting a stay of the instant federal action and denying a stay of a parallel criminal proceeding are overruled. Plaintiffs shall direct any motion for a preservation order and any complaints about the sufficiency of the defendants' compliance with Magistrate Judge Mann's Orders to Magis trate Judge Mann. Further, E. Gustave's request for discovery and requests for permission to make a "Declarative Judgment in lieu of a Default Judgment" against the defendants are denied. Defendant Criminal Court's Motion to Dism iss is stricken without prejudice to refile, upon leave of the court in accordance with this court's Individual Practices, upon expiration of the stay. Because the Motion to Dismiss has been struck, plaintiffs shall not serve on defendants or f ile with this court their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on plaintiffs and to note the service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 11/16/2010. (Hershenberg, Anna)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reason stated in the Memorandum and Order, this Court grants 31 the City defendants' request for a Motion to Stay the instant civil action; denies 27 plaintiffs' request for a Motion to Stay the state criminal prosecution of Edwina Gustave. Any objections to the recommendations contained in this Memorandum and Order must be filed with the Hon. Kiyo A. Matsumoto on or before 10/25/10. (Mann, Roanne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
