Paige v. LaCoste et al
Plaintiff: Zaire Paige
Defendant: City Of New York, City of New York Police Department 73rd Pct., City of New York Police Department 81st Pct., City of New York Police Department 88th Pct., Det. Thomas Donohue, John Doe 1&2, John Doe 1,2 & 3, Rashan LaCoste and P.O. Herbert & partner John Doe
Case Number: 1:2010cv03356
Filed: July 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Sandra L. Townes
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court denies Mr. Paige's objections and dismisses the action with prejudice. The Court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for purpose of an appeal. ( Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 9/22/2014 ) c/m *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Since this action was dismissed as a sanction for pltff's repeated failure to comply with this Court's orders relating to medical releases, it would be unjust not to reconsider this dismissal in the face of evidence th at pltff made at least some effort to provide the releases. Pltff's motion for reconsideration is, therefore, granted. This Court's Order and Civil Judgment dated 11/28/11, is vacated and the Clerk of Court is directed to re-open this case. (Granting 62 Motion to Vacate) Corporation Counsel is directed to re-serve the releases on pltff on or before 7/30/12, with detailed instructions re: how they are to be completed. Pltff shall (1) complete and return the releases to Corporation Co unsel and (2) mail a copy of the completed releases to this Court on or before 8/27/12. If pltff has any procedural questions re: how to complete medical releases, he should contact the Pro Se Office at this courthouse by mail or by calling 718-613-2665. If pltff fails to return properly executed releases within the time allowed or to show good cause why he could not do so, this action will be dismissed. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 7/18/2012) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This Court construes Document #59, which is entitled both "Affidavit of Facts" and "Writ of Recusal," to be a motion seeking the recusal of all judges involved in both cases (10-CV-3356 and 10-CV-5469). Since both of these cases are closed, the motion is moot. Even if it were not moot, however, this Court would decline to recuse itself for the reasons set forth in the attached document. So Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 1/13/2012. (Manuel, Germaine)
November 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER AND CIVIL JUDGMENT: This Court adopts the 49 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. In addition, plaintiff is advised that by failing to file timely objections to the R&R, he has waived the right to appeal this Order. SO ORDERED by Judge Sandra L. Townes, on 11/28/2011. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, As discussed above, neither of the above-referenced actions has yet been dismissed. However, both actions will be dismissed unless pltff takes the actions described above and in the enclosed prior orders by 11/14/11. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/24/2011) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
August 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER denying 47 Motion for Discovery; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 45 Letter MOTION to Dismiss filed by Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York. For the reasons herein, plaintiff's motion to compel discovery is deni ed. Furthermore, I respectfully recommend that his complaint be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Should Paige execute and return the releases to Corporation Counsel within the allotted time for objections, he shall file an affidavit with the Court indicating his compliance, and this recommendation shall be deemed withdrawn. Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 8/24/2011. (Lee, Victoria)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paige v. LaCoste et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York Police Department 73rd Pct.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York Police Department 81st Pct.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York Police Department 88th Pct.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Det. Thomas Donohue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1&2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1,2 & 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rashan LaCoste
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.O. Herbert & partner John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zaire Paige
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?