Davis v. NYC Dept. of Education et al
| Catherine E. Davis |
| Lisa Linder and NYC Dept. of Education |
| 1:2010cv03812 |
| August 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety as provide d in the enclosed Memorandum & Order. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. Unit ed States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The clerk of court is respectfully requested to enter judgment for defendant, mail a copy of the judgment and this Memorandum & Order to plaintiff, and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/7/2014. (Raghunathan, Abhishek)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims against defendant Linder is granted with prejudice, and defend ants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims against defendant New York City Department of Education is denied. The parties are strongly encouraged to engage in settlement negotiations rather than spend additional time, money, and resources on further motion practice. Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on plaintiff and to file a declaration of service on the docket by January 19, 2012. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/18/2012. (Winterkorn, Margaret)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. As set forth in the attached Order, plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and she is directed to pay the statutory filing fee of $350 within ten (10) days of the date of this Order in order to proceed with this action. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for ten (10) days or until plaintiff has complied with this Order. If plaintiff fails to pay t he filing fee within the time allowed, the instant complaint shall be dismissed without prejudice. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 8/27/2010. (Hershenberg, Anna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
