Idrovo v. Mission Design and Management , Inc. et al
Marcos Idrovo |
John Doe, Mission Design and Management , Inc. and John S. Shin |
1:2010cv04188 |
September 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Roanne L. Mann |
Sandra L. Townes |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 ORDER dated 12/30/13 that this Court adopts Magistrate Mann's recommendation set forth in her minute entry dated August 12, 2013, that this action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and to close this case. However, to the extent that plaintiff misunderstood the import of Magistrate Judge Mann's minute entry and/or the consequences of failing to file timely objections, he may file a motion for reconsideration of this order within 30 days of this date of this order. ( Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 12/30/13 ) *Forwarded for judgment (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. See attached order for further details. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 12/27/2012. (Siegfried, Evan) |
Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 4/17/2012. (Siegfried, Evan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.