Rahman v. AMKC Warden (Mr. Cripps) et al
| Malik Rahman |
| AMKC Warden (Mr. Cripps), Hutchinson (Officer) and Ortiz (Officer) |
| 1:2010cv04402 |
| September 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court grants plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis for the limited purpose of this Order and dismisses the complaint. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which must be submitted to the Court with in 20 days of the date of this Order. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings are stayed for 20 days in order for plaintiff to comply with this Order. If plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, the complaint shall b e dismissed and judgment shall enter. Once submitted, the amended complaint will be reviewed for compliance with this Order and for sufficiency under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/12/2010. C/M by chambers. (Manuel, Germaine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
