Hilaire v. Dewalt Industrial Tool Co.
Plaintiff: Cleant Hilaire
Defendant: Dewalt Industrial Tool Co.
Case Number: 1:2010cv05071
Filed: November 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: I. Leo Glasser
Presiding Judge: Cheryl L. Pollak
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety. The defendant's motion to preclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert and its motion for summary judgment are granted. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 10/8/2014. (Kessler, Stanley)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilaire v. Dewalt Industrial Tool Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dewalt Industrial Tool Co.
Represented By: Michael K. Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cleant Hilaire
Represented By: Pat J. Crispi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?